1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre (76 HP) has 2 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 35 kg more than 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre.
Because 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Aston Martin | Renault |
Model | 2-Litre | Clio |
Year Released | 1948 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2580 mm |