1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre. (76 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre.
Because 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Aston Martin 2-Litre | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Aston Martin | Ford |
Model | 2-Litre | E-350 |
Year Released | 1948 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1806 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2619 mm |