1948 Austin 16 vs. 1989 Mazda 323
To start off, 1989 Mazda 323 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1948 Austin 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Mazda 323 (66 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1948 Austin 16. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Mazda 323 should accelerate faster than 1948 Austin 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Austin 16 weights approximately 410 kg more than 1989 Mazda 323.
Because 1948 Austin 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Austin 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1948 Austin 16 (146 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Mazda 323. (101 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1948 Austin 16 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Austin 16 | 1989 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | 16 | 323 |
Year Released | 1948 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1680 mm |