1948 Austin 16 vs. 2001 Daewoo Korando

To start off, 2001 Daewoo Korando is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Austin 16 would be higher. At 3,199 cc, 2001 Daewoo Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Daewoo Korando (105 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1948 Austin 16. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Korando should accelerate faster than 1948 Austin 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Austin 16 weights approximately 192 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Korando.

Because 1948 Austin 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Austin 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Korando, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1948 Austin 16 (146 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Korando. (145 Nm). This means 1948 Austin 16 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Korando. 2001 Daewoo Korando has automatic transmission and 1948 Austin 16 has manual transmission. 1948 Austin 16 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Daewoo Korando will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: