1948 Austin A 110 vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1959 Cadillac 62 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Austin A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Austin A 110 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1948 Austin A 110. (124 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1948 Austin A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 145 kg more than 1948 Austin A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1948 Austin A 110 has manual transmission. 1948 Austin A 110 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Austin A 110 | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A 110 | 62 |
Year Released | 1948 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3990 cc | 6382 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1980 kg | 2125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 79 L |