1948 Austin A 110 vs. 1965 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 1965 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Austin A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Austin A 110 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Eldorado (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1948 Austin A 110. (124 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1948 Austin A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 135 kg more than 1948 Austin A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Austin A 110 | 1965 Cadillac Eldorado | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 110 | Eldorado |
| Year Released | 1948 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3990 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1980 kg | 2115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 82 L |
