1948 Austin A 110 vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Austin A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Austin A 110 would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1948 Austin A 110. (124 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1948 Austin A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Austin A 110 weights approximately 840 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Austin A 110 | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Austin | Sunbeam |
Model | A 110 | Tiger |
Year Released | 1948 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 3990 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1980 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 27 L |