1948 Austin A 40 vs. 1956 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1956 Toyota Master RR is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,453 cc, 1956 Toyota Master RR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Toyota Master RR (40 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1948 Austin A 40. (38 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Toyota Master RR should accelerate faster than 1948 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 240 kg more than 1948 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Austin A 40 | 1956 Toyota Master RR | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | A 40 | Master RR |
Year Released | 1948 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 40 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2540 mm |