1948 Austin A 40 vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix

To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1948 Austin A 40. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1948 Austin A 40.

Because 1948 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1948 Austin A 40. (80 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1948 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications:

1948 Austin A 40 2012 Toyota Matrix
Make Austin Toyota
Model A 40 Matrix
Year Released 1948 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1200 cc 2400 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 38 HP 158 HP
Engine RPM 4300 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 80 Nm 219 Nm
Torque RPM 2300 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Width 1560 mm 1765 mm
Vehicle Height 1620 mm 1549 mm
Wheelbase Size 2360 mm 2601 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 48 L 50 L