1948 Austin A 90 vs. 2013 Lincoln MKZ
To start off, 2013 Lincoln MKZ is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1948 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Lincoln MKZ (237 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1948 Austin A 90. (87 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lincoln MKZ should accelerate faster than 1948 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lincoln MKZ weights approximately 260 kg more than 1948 Austin A 90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1948 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Lincoln MKZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lincoln MKZ (366 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1948 Austin A 90. (190 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Lincoln MKZ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1948 Austin A 90. 2013 Lincoln MKZ has automatic transmission and 1948 Austin A 90 has manual transmission. 1948 Austin A 90 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Lincoln MKZ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Austin A 90 | 2013 Lincoln MKZ | |
Make | Austin | Lincoln |
Model | A 90 | MKZ |
Year Released | 1948 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2660 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2116 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1478 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 63 L |