1948 Bristol 400 vs. 1969 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1969 Ford Fairlane is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Bristol 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Bristol 400 would be higher. At 2,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Fairlane (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1948 Bristol 400. (79 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1948 Bristol 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 140 kg more than 1948 Bristol 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Bristol 400 | 1969 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Bristol | Ford |
| Model | 400 | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 1948 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 2781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 5110 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2960 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 40 L |
