1948 Bristol 400 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Bristol 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Bristol 400 would be higher. At 1,970 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Bristol 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1948 Bristol 400. (79 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1948 Bristol 400.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1948 Bristol 400. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1948 Bristol 400.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Bristol 400 | 2000 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
Model | 400 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1948 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 139 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2210 mm |