1948 Bristol 401 vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1959 Cadillac 62 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Bristol 401. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Bristol 401 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1948 Bristol 401. (85 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1948 Bristol 401. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 900 kg more than 1948 Bristol 401. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1948 Bristol 401 has manual transmission. 1948 Bristol 401 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Bristol 401 | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | 401 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1948 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1969 cc | 6382 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 2125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 79 L |
