1948 Bristol 401 vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1962 Nissan Cedric is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Bristol 401. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Bristol 401 would be higher. At 1,969 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Bristol 401 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Bristol 401 (85 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1948 Bristol 401 should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Bristol 401 weights approximately 295 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1948 Bristol 401 (145 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1948 Bristol 401 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Bristol 401 | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Bristol | Nissan |
Model | 401 | Cedric |
Year Released | 1948 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2540 mm |