1948 Bristol 401 vs. 1989 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Bristol 401. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Bristol 401 would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (238 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1948 Bristol 401. (85 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1948 Bristol 401.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (467 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 1948 Bristol 401. (145 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1948 Bristol 401.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Bristol 401 | 1989 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
Model | 401 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1948 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 5735 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 467 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 88.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2580 mm |