1948 Bristol 450 vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1962 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1948 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1948 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 1145 kg more than 1948 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Bristol 450 | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Bristol | Ford |
| Model | 450 | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 1948 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 6964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 345 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1875 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 40 L |
