1948 Bristol 450 vs. 1990 Ford RS 200
To start off, 1990 Ford RS 200 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Bristol 450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford RS 200 (250 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1948 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 1948 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford RS 200 weights approximately 450 kg more than 1948 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1990 Ford RS 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Bristol 450. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford RS 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Bristol 450 | 1990 Ford RS 200 | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | 450 | RS 200 |
Year Released | 1948 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 77.7 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 54 L |