1948 Bristol 450 vs. 2002 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2002 Toyota Celica is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Bristol 450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Bristol 450 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2002 Toyota Celica. (129 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1948 Bristol 450 should accelerate faster than 2002 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota Celica weights approximately 410 kg more than 1948 Bristol 450.
Because 1948 Bristol 450 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Bristol 450. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Bristol 450 | 2002 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Bristol | Toyota |
| Model | 450 | Celica |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1832 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 91.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 55 L |
