1948 Bristol 450 vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (261 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1948 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1948 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 788 kg more than 1948 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Bristol 450 | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Bristol | Ford |
| Model | 450 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 261 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 90 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1518 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 59 L |
