1948 Bristol 450 vs. 2010 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac STS is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1948 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1948 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac STS weights approximately 1072 kg more than 1948 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Bristol 450 | 2010 Cadillac STS | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | 450 | STS |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 302 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1802 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1844 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1463 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2957 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 64 L |
