1948 Bristol 450 vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1948 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1948 Bristol 450.
Because 1948 Bristol 450 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Bristol 450. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Bristol 450 | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | 450 | E-350 |
Year Released | 1948 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 57 L |