1948 Bristol 450 vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (385 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1948 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1948 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XF weights approximately 1115 kg more than 1948 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Bristol 450 | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Bristol | Jaguar |
Model | 450 | XF |
Year Released | 1948 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 70 L |