1948 Buick 40 vs. 1962 Morris Minor
To start off, 1962 Morris Minor is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1948 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Buick 40 (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1962 Morris Minor. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1948 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1962 Morris Minor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Buick 40 weights approximately 870 kg more than 1962 Morris Minor. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Buick 40 | 1962 Morris Minor | |
Make | Buick | Morris |
Model | 40 | Minor |
Year Released | 1948 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.6 mm | 64.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 83.7 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 825 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2190 mm |