1948 Buick 40 vs. 1964 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1964 Cadillac Sixty is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Buick 40 would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1948 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1948 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 425 kg more than 1948 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Buick 40 | 1964 Cadillac Sixty | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | 40 | Sixty |
Year Released | 1948 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 7027 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 2120 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3300 mm |