1948 Buick 40 vs. 1968 Toyota 2000GT
To start off, 1968 Toyota 2000GT is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1948 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Toyota 2000GT (127 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1948 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Toyota 2000GT should accelerate faster than 1948 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Buick 40 weights approximately 531 kg more than 1968 Toyota 2000GT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Buick 40 | 1968 Toyota 2000GT | |
| Make | Buick | Toyota |
| Model | 40 | 2000GT |
| Year Released | 1948 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 127 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.6 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 75 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 1164 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2510 mm |
