1948 Buick 40 vs. 1995 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1948 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (220 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1948 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 1948 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Buick 40 weights approximately 595 kg more than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Buick 40 | 1995 Mazda RX-01 | |
| Make | Buick | Mazda |
| Model | 40 | RX-01 |
| Year Released | 1948 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 2614 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 1100 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2350 mm |
