1948 Buick 40 vs. 1996 Fiat Palio
To start off, 1996 Fiat Palio is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,064 cc (8 cylinders), 1948 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Buick 40 (108 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Palio. (60 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1948 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Palio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Buick 40 weights approximately 750 kg more than 1996 Fiat Palio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1948 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Palio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Buick 40 | 1996 Fiat Palio | |
| Make | Buick | Fiat |
| Model | 40 | Palio |
| Year Released | 1948 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4064 cc | 994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 895 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2370 mm |
