1948 Buick 40 vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,439 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz E (349 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1948 Buick 40. (142 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1948 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Buick 40 weights approximately 403 kg more than 2000 Mercedes-Benz E.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Buick 40 | 2000 Mercedes-Benz E | |
| Make | Buick | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 40 | E |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5249 cc | 5439 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 142 HP | 349 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 97 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 109.5 mm | 91.9 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1848 kg | 1445 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2720 mm |
