1948 Buick 40 vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,064 cc (8 cylinders), 1948 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Celica (189 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1948 Buick 40. (108 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1948 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Buick 40 weights approximately 526 kg more than 2000 Toyota Celica.
Because 1948 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Buick 40 | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Buick | Toyota |
Model | 40 | Celica |
Year Released | 1948 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4064 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 1119 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2610 mm |