1948 Buick 40 vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1948 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Buick 40 (114 HP) has 44 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1948 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Buick 40 weights approximately 955 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Buick 40 | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Buick | MCC |
Model | 40 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1948 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 740 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 1810 mm |