1948 Buick 40 vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1948 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Buick 40 (142 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2002 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1948 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Buick 40 weights approximately 948 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1948 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Buick 40 | 2002 Renault Clio | |
Make | Buick | Renault |
Model | 40 | Clio |
Year Released | 1948 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5249 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 109.5 mm | 76.8 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1848 kg | 900 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2480 mm |