1948 Buick 40 vs. 2003 Mazda 3
To start off, 2003 Mazda 3 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,064 cc (8 cylinders), 1948 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 3 (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1948 Buick 40. (108 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1948 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Buick 40 weights approximately 335 kg more than 2003 Mazda 3.
Because 1948 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Buick 40 | 2003 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | 40 | 3 |
Year Released | 1948 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4064 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 1310 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2730 mm |