1948 Buick 40 vs. 2003 Volvo C70
To start off, 2003 Volvo C70 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1948 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo C70 (160 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1948 Buick 40. (142 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1948 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Buick 40 weights approximately 448 kg more than 2003 Volvo C70.
Because 1948 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Buick 40 | 2003 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Buick | Volvo |
Model | 40 | C70 |
Year Released | 1948 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5249 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 109.5 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1848 kg | 1400 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2670 mm |