1948 Buick 40 vs. 2004 Mazda 2
To start off, 2004 Mazda 2 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1948 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Buick 40 (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 2. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1948 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 2 weights approximately 93 kg more than 1948 Buick 40.
Because 1948 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Buick 40 | 2004 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | 40 | 2 |
Year Released | 1948 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.6 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 81.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 1788 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2500 mm |