1948 Buick 40 vs. 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1948 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (181 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1948 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo should accelerate faster than 1948 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Buick 40 weights approximately 180 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Because 1948 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Buick 40 | 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | |
Make | Buick | Chevrolet |
Model | 40 | Monte Carlo |
Year Released | 1948 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 3343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 181 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.6 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 1515 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2810 mm |