1948 Buick 40 vs. 2005 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1948 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1948 Buick 40. (142 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1948 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Buick 40 weights approximately 351 kg more than 2005 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Buick 40 | 2005 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | 40 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1948 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5249 cc | 4015 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 109.5 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1848 kg | 1497 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2620 mm |