1948 Buick 40 vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1948 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Buick 40 (142 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1948 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1948 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Buick 40 | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Buick | Volkswagen |
| Model | 40 | Polo |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5249 cc | 1595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 142 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2520 mm |
