1948 Buick 40 vs. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1948 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 869 kg more than 1948 Buick 40.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Buick 40 | 2008 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Buick | Land Rover |
| Model | 40 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5249 cc | 3628 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 142 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 109.5 mm | 88 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1848 kg | 2717 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2890 mm |
