1948 Buick 40 vs. 2010 Ford Ka
To start off, 2010 Ford Ka is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,064 cc (8 cylinders), 1948 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Buick 40 (108 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1948 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ka.
Because 1948 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Buick 40 | 2010 Ford Ka | |
| Make | Buick | Ford |
| Model | 40 | Ka |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4064 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 68 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2450 mm |
