1948 Buick 40 vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1948 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1948 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1948 Buick 40.
Because 2012 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Buick 40 | 2012 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | 40 | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1948 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.6 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 102 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3010 mm |