1948 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Citroen Saxo
To start off, 1996 Citroen Saxo is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,674 cc (8 cylinders), 1948 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 980 kg more than 1996 Citroen Saxo.
Because 1948 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Citroen Saxo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Cadillac 62 | 1996 Citroen Saxo | |
Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
Model | 62 | Saxo |
Year Released | 1948 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5674 cc | 1527 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 55 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1870 kg | 890 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2390 mm |