1948 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,674 cc (8 cylinders), 1948 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 751 kg more than 2000 Toyota Celica.
Because 1948 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | 62 | Celica |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5674 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 189 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1870 kg | 1119 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2610 mm |
