1948 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Toyota Opa
To start off, 2000 Toyota Opa is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,674 cc (8 cylinders), 1948 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 600 kg more than 2000 Toyota Opa.
Because 1948 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Opa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Toyota Opa | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | 62 | Opa |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5674 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1870 kg | 1270 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2630 mm |
