1948 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2000 Toyota Tundra is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,674 cc (8 cylinders), 1948 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 80 kg more than 1948 Cadillac 62.
Because 2000 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | 62 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5674 cc | 4663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1870 kg | 1950 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3270 mm |
