1948 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Kia Visto
To start off, 2003 Kia Visto is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,674 cc (8 cylinders), 1948 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1070 kg more than 2003 Kia Visto.
Because 1948 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Kia Visto, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Kia Visto | |
| Make | Cadillac | Kia |
| Model | 62 | Visto |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5674 cc | 796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1870 kg | 800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2390 mm |
