1948 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,674 cc (8 cylinders), 1948 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 316 kg more than 1948 Cadillac 62.
Because 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 62 | ML |
Year Released | 1948 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5674 cc | 3720 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 232 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1870 kg | 2186 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2810 mm |