1948 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,674 cc (8 cylinders), 1948 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Audi TT | |
| Make | Cadillac | Audi |
| Model | 62 | TT |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5674 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2469 mm |
