1948 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Fiat Panda
To start off, 2010 Fiat Panda is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,674 cc (8 cylinders), 1948 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 917 kg more than 2010 Fiat Panda.
Because 1948 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Panda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Fiat Panda | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | 62 | Panda |
| Year Released | 1948 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5674 cc | 1242 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1870 kg | 953 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2310 mm |
