1948 Citroen 11 vs. 1981 Volvo 240
To start off, 1981 Volvo 240 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 2,127 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Volvo 240 (96 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1948 Citroen 11. (55 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 1948 Citroen 11.
Because 1981 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1948 Citroen 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1948 Citroen 11 | 1981 Volvo 240 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | 11 | 240 |
| Year Released | 1948 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1909 cc | 2127 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2660 mm |
