1948 Citroen 2CV vs. 1966 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1966 Lotus Elan is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,556 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1948 Citroen 2CV. (9 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1948 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Citroen 2CV weights approximately 22 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Because 1966 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1948 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1948 Citroen 2CV | 1966 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Citroen | Lotus |
Model | 2CV | Elan |
Year Released | 1948 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 375 cc | 1556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 9 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 682 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 20 L | 29 L |